Management of penetrating cardiac injury and tricuspid regurgitation with extracorporeal-membrane oxygenation (ECMO): a case report.

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds (GSW) to the heart are lethal, and most patients die before they arrive to the hospital. Survival decreases with number of cardiac chambers involved. We report a case of a 17-year-old male who survived a GSW injury involving two cardiac chambers with acute severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) who subsequently developed cardiogenic shock requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. CASE PRESENTATION: A 17-year-old male sustained a single gunshot wound to the left chest, resulting in pericardial tamponade and right hemothorax. Emergency sternotomy revealed injury to the right ventricle and inferior cavoatrial junction with the adjacent pericardium contributing to a right hemothorax. The cardiac injuries were repaired primarily. Tricuspid regurgitation was confirmed immediately postoperatively. Five days after presentation, the patient developed cardiogenic shock secondary to TR requiring emergent stabilization with ECMO. He subsequently underwent successful tricuspid valve replacement. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report to our knowledge of successful ECMO support of severe TR due to gunshot injury to the heart.

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation within stentless landing zones: Procedural insights from a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive therapeutic option compared with redo surgical valve replacement for high-risk patients. Relative to procedures within stented surgical valves, VIV-TAVI within stentless valves is associated with a higher complication rate due to challenging underlying anatomy and absence of fluoroscopic landmarks. AIMS: We share a single-center experience with VIV-TAVI in stentless valves, discussing our procedural insights and associated outcomes. METHODS: Our institutional database was queried, and 25 patients who had undergone VIV-TAVI within a stentless bioprosthesis, homograft, or valve-sparing aortic root replacement between 2013 and 2022 were found. Outcome endpoints were based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. RESULTS: The mean age of the cohort was 69.5 ± 13.6 years. VIV implantation was performed within a homograft in 11 patients, a stentless bioprothesis in 10 patients, and a valve-sparing aortic root replacement in 4 patients. Nineteen (76%) balloon-expandable valves, 5 (20%) self-expanding valves, and one mechanically-expandable (4%) valve were implanted with 100% procedural success, with no instances of significant paravalvular leak, coronary occlusion, or device embolization. There was one (4%) in-hospitality mortality after an emergency procedure; one (4%) patient experienced a transient ischemic attack; and two (8%) patients required permanent pacemaker implantation. The median length of hospital stay was 2 days. After a median follow-up time of 16.5 months, valve function was acceptable in all patients with available data. CONCLUSION: VIV-TAVI within stentless valves can be safely performed with methodical procedural technique and can provide clinical benefit in patients at high reoperation risk.

No-Implant Interatrial Shunt for HFpEF: 6-Month Outcomes From Multicenter Pilot Feasibility Studies.

BACKGROUND: Most approaches to the creation of an interatrial shunt require placement of a permanent implant to maintain patency. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of a no-implant interatrial shunt for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). METHODS: This was a multicenter, uncontrolled study of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and NYHA functional class ≥II, ejection fraction >40%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during supine exercise ≥25 mm Hg with PCWP-to-right atrial gradient ≥5 mm Hg. Follow-up was through 6 months with imaging to assess shunt durability. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were enrolled: mean age was 68 ± 9 years, and 68% were female. Baseline resting and peak exercise PCWP were 19 ± 7 mm Hg and 40 ± 11 mm Hg, respectively. All procedures displayed technical success with confirmation of left-to-right flow (shunt diameter 7.1 ± 0.9 mm). At 1 month, peak exercise PCWP decreased 5.4 ± 9.6 mm Hg (P = 0.011) with no change in right atrial pressure. There were no serious device or procedure-related adverse events through 6 months. Mean 6-minute walk distance increased 101 ± 71 meters (P < 0.001); Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score increased 26 ± 19 points (P < 0.001); N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide decreased 372 ± 857 pg/mL (P = 0.018); and shunt patency was confirmed with unchanged diameter. CONCLUSIONS: In these feasibility studies of a no-implant interatrial shunt, HFpEF/HFmrEF shunts exhibited stability with favorable safety and early efficacy signals. The results show promise toward this new approach for treating patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and an appropriate hemodynamic profile. (Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-1]; NCT04583527; Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Percutaneously Created Interatrial Shunt to Alleviate Heart Failure Symptoms in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Preserved or Mid-Range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [ALLEVIATE-HF-2]; NCT04838353).

Feasibility of a No-Implant Approach to Interatrial Shunts: Preclinical and Early Clinical Studies.

Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction represents a major unmet clinical need with limited treatment options. Recent device therapies under investigation have focused on decompression of the left atrium through an implantable interatrial shunt. Although these devices have shown favorable safety and efficacy signals, an implant is required to maintain shunt patency, which may increase the patient risk profile and complicate subsequent interventions requiring transseptal access. Methods: The Alleviant System is a no-implant approach to creating an interatrial shunt using radiofrequency energy to securely capture, excise, and extract a precise disk of tissue from the interatrial septum. Acute preclinical studies in healthy swine (n = 5) demonstrated the feasibility of the Alleviant System to repeatably create a 7 mm interatrial orifice with minimal collateral thermal effect and minimal platelet and fibrin deposition observed histologically. Results: Chronic animal studies (n = 9) were carried out to 30- and 60-day time points and exhibited sustained shunt patency with histology demonstrating completely healed margins, endothelialization, and no trauma to adjacent atrial tissue. Preliminary clinical safety and feasibility were validated in a first-in-human study in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 15). All patients demonstrated shunt patency by transesophageal echocardiographic imaging at 1, 3, and 6 months, as well as cardiac computed tomography imaging at 6-month follow-up timepoints. Conclusions: Combined, these data support the safety and feasibility of a novel no-implant approach to creating an interatrial shunt using the Alleviant System. Continued follow-up and subsequent clinical studies are currently ongoing.

The rapid transformation of cardiac surgery practice in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: Insights and clinical strategies from a center at the epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.

The rapid transformation of cardiac surgery practice in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: insights and clinical strategies from a centre at the epicentre.

OBJECTIVES: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery programme and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our programme, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programmes around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programmes to plan for the future.

The Rapid Transformation of Cardiac Surgery Practice in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: Insights and Clinical Strategies From a Center at the Epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has forced our cardiac surgery program and hospital to enact drastic measures that has forced us to change how we care for cardiac surgery patients, assist with COVID-19 care, and enable support for the hospital in terms of physical resources, providers, and resident training. METHODS: In this review, we review the cardiovascular manifestations of COVID-19 and describe our system-wide adaptations to the pandemic, including the use of telemedicine, how a severe reduction in operative volume affected our program, the process of redeployment of staff, repurposing of residents into specific task teams, the creation of operation room intensive care units, and the challenges that we faced in this process. RESULTS: We offer a revised set of definitions of surgical priority during this pandemic and how this was applied to our system, followed by specific considerations in coronary/valve, aortic, heart failure and transplant surgery. Finally, we outline a path forward for cardiac surgery for the near future. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize that individual programs around the world will eventually face COVID-19 with varying levels of infection burden and different resources, and we hope this document can assist programs to plan for the future.

Feasibility and Early Safety of Single-Stage Hybrid Coronary Intervention and Valvular Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid percutaneous coronary intervention offers an alternative method of revascularization for high-risk surgical populations. We report the outcomes of a single-stage hybrid strategy in valvular cardiac surgery and explore its effects on operative risk and bleeding. METHODS: In a hybrid operating room, 26 patients underwent hybrid surgery consisting of femoral arterial access, then coronary stenting followed by valve surgery, with appropriate heparin dosing. Clopidogrel (300 mg) was given on anesthesia induction in nonreoperative cases, or at the time of cross clamping (after stenting) for reoperative cases. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 680 ± 277 days. The planned coronary stenting and surgery was successful in all patients. Major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events occurred in 1 patient, with no inhospital deaths observed. No vascular complication or stent thrombosis was observed with the described antiplatelet regimen. Outcomes were comparable to those of standard bypass valve replacement surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility and early safety of a single-stage hybrid strategy with coronary stenting followed by valvular surgery in patients at increased surgical risk. Hybrid procedures may lower operative risk by eliminating or reducing the need for bypass grafting.

Transthoracic access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: technique using the Edwards Sapien Retroflex delivery system.

We describe our experience using the Edwards Sapien transfemoral Retroflex 3 catheter delivery system for transcatheter aortic valve replacement through the transapical and transaortic approaches. Transthoracic transcatheter valve replacement by the transapical and transaortic approaches can be safely and effectively performed with the Retroflex 3 delivery catheter, which affords several advantages over other available delivery devices.